El Clásico: did the ref get it right?
2 · Read
Hello and welcome. Real Madrid won two-one on Sunday. The referee did not show a card after Cancelo's tackle. Was that the right decision? Marcus, former football referee and pundit. Alejandra, sports journalist covering La Liga. David, former football player and analyst.
Marcus, you've refereed at the top level. Walk us through what Cancelo did and what the laws say.
Yellow card, clearly. Nothing at all is not acceptable. Cancelo put his boot into the back of Diomande's leg. That's dangerous, and dangerous play must always be punished. Player safety first.
Sorry, but "always"? Referees judge the moment, not a rulebook.
David, you've been in those boots. Was that a dangerous tackle or just Clásico football?
Bad tackle, not a dangerous one. Yellow, and we move on. In my day as a player, I did the same at the Bernabéu. Late on a fast player. Yellow card, correct. However, Martínez Munuera showing nothing, that's a mistake.
No, David, that's where I disagree. Bad and dangerous aren't two separate things here. Diomande was running at full speed, and Cancelo's boot landed on his leg. Look at Diomande's face afterwards. That tells you everything.
No, no, wait. A player's face is pain, not evidence. I've seen men roll over from nothing. Judge the contact: boot on leg, speed, force. That's yellow, not red.
David, go ahead.
A painful face never decided a card for me.
And that's the problem. A referee is not a machine. He reads the player, the speed, the moment. Diomande stayed down, the bench was up. Martínez Munuera saw all of that and gave nothing.
Marcus, she says the ref reads the moment. Does he, or does the law do the work?
Key vocabulary
- referee — Official who enforces rules during a match
- analyst — Person who examines and explains sports events
- magnitude — The great size or extent of something
- offence — A violation of rules or a breach of conduct
Comprehension questions
- Why does Marcus think Cancelo's tackle should have been punished?
- What does David think about Cancelo's tackle?
- Why does Alejandra disagree with David's opinion?
- What does Marcus think about using a player's face to decide a card?
- How does Alejandra think a referee should make decisions?
True or false?
- Marcus thinks the referee should always punish dangerous play. T / F
- David says he never looked at a player's face when he was a referee. T / F
- Alejandra believes the referee should follow the rulebook exactly. T / F
- Marcus thinks a player's face is always the best evidence of an injury. T / F
Discuss in pairs
- Do you think referees should follow the rules in the same way every time, or should they change their decision depending on the situation?
- In football, is it more important to protect players from injury, or to let players play without too many cards?
- Can you trust what you see on a player's face after a tackle, or do players sometimes pretend to be more hurt than they are?
The whole debate, free every day Students can hear the full 6-minute episode with a synced transcript in the RoundTalk app.
Get it on Google Play iPhone: join the waitlistAnswer key
Comprehension- Because it was dangerous play, and player safety must always come first.
- It was a bad tackle but not a dangerous one, so a yellow card was correct.
- Because bad and dangerous are the same thing in this case, and Diomande's pain and reaction show it was serious.
- He thinks it is not evidence because players can pretend to be hurt.
- By reading the player, the speed, and the moment, not by following rules like a machine.
- True
- True
- False
- False
roundtalk · https://www.getroundtalk.com/listen/english/b1/el-clasico-did-the-ref-get-it-right/worksheet/